Journals
Sunday,Oct 5 2008, 09:26:28 AMBernard Kouchner : Israel would strike Iran
French FM warns of Israeli strike on Iran nuclear sites
2 hours, 12 minutes ago
JERUSALEM, (AFP) - French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner warned in comments published on Sunday that Israel would strike archfoe Iran before it succeeding in developing nuclear weapons.
"I honestly don't believe (a nuclear weapon) will give any immunity to Iran," Kouchner said in an interview conducted in English with Israel's Haaretz newspaper during a two-day visit to the region.
"First, because you will eat them before. And this is the danger. Israel has always said it will not wait for the bomb to be ready. I think that (the Iranians) know. Everyone knows."
Kouchner said he hoped tough diplomacy and sanctions would persuade Iran to halt its uranium enrichment programme, which Israel and many Western countries believe is aimed at developing nuclear weapons.
"Iran with an atomic bomb is unacceptable at all... Talking, talking talking, and offering dialogue, sanctions, sanctions, sanctions. Is the alternative to bomb first -- I think not."
Iran has always insisted its nuclear drive is entirely peaceful. Israel is widely regarded as the only nuclear armed state in the Middle East but it has never confirmed or denied having an arsenal.
Kouchner is set to meet outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livnicoalition government to succeed Olmert -- on Sunday. -- who is currently struggling to form a new
France currently holds the rotating presidency of the European Union, which has been sponsoring Israeli-Palestinian peace talks as part of the Middle East Quartet, which also includes the United States, the United Nations, and Russia.
On Saturday Kouchner toured the West Bank town of Jenin, the focus of a months-old Palestinian security crackdown that has been praised by Israel and the United States -- and met Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas.
Kouchner hailed the peace talks which were formally relaunched last November but said they were unlikely to meet their stated goal of a comprehensive agreement by the end of the year.
Wednesday,Sep 17 2008, 10:47:57 AMHeadlines
IAEA shows photos alleging Iran nuclear missile work
By Mark Heinrich Tue Sep 16, 6:33 PM ET
VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N. nuclear watchdog showed documents and photographs on Tuesday suggesting Iran secretly tried to modify a missile cone to fit a nuclear bomb, diplomats said, and Tehran again dismissed the findings as forged.
Iran said an International Atomic Energy Agency inquiry into its nuclear activity was at a dead-end because the IAEA was demanding Tehran reveal conventional military secrets without nuclear dimensions. Iran has denied seeking atom bombs.
The Vienna-based U.N. watchdog said in a report on Monday that Iranian stonewalling had brought an agency inquiry to resolve whether Tehran had covertly researched ways to make a nuclear bomb to a standstill.
Britain has accused Iran of showing contempt for the U.N. watchdog and, with the United States and France, vowed to seek harsher sanctions on Tehran over its defiance of U.N. demands for full disclosure and a suspension of uranium enrichment.
The IAEA wants Iran to clarify intelligence material pointing to links between Iranian projects to process uranium, test high explosives and modify the cone of its long-distance Shahab-3 missile in a way suitable for a nuclear warhead.
The Islamic Republic has denied the allegations but the IAEA says Iran must substantiate its position by granting access to sites, documents and relevant officials for interviews.
Herman Naeckerts, the agency's head of inspections in the Middle East region, briefed its governing board on the report's findings on Tuesday ahead of a meeting by the 35-nation body next week likely to heighten pressure on Iran to cooperate.
Washington's IAEA envoy said Naeckerts presented photos and diagrams of Iranian work on re-designing a Shabab-3 "to carry what would appear to be a nuclear weapon."
"VERY CREDIBLE"
"The (IAEA) Secretariat told us the information they have is in their words, 'very credible', unquote, and they have asked Iran to provide 'substantive responses', unquote," Ambassador Gregory Schulte told reporters.
He said Naeckerts told the closed meeting Iran had refused IAEA requests to interview engineers involved in the work and visit their ostensibly civilian workshops, depicted in photos.
Other diplomats in the meeting said Naeckerts emphasised the information remained unverified. "His presentation was professional and balanced," one said, asking for anonymity.
Another diplomat said some countries on the board questioned the IAEA's mandate to judge intelligence data related to ballistic missiles and high explosives.
Iran repeated that the intelligence was forged or pertained only to conventional arms. It said Iran faced extraordinary and unacceptable pressure to prove unverified allegations were wrong by revealing information vital to its national security.
"No country would give information about its conventional military activities," Iran's IAEA ambassador said.
"I said in this briefing, 'Who in the world would believe there are a series of top secret documents U.S. intelligence found in a laptop regarding a Manhattan Project-type nuclear (bomb programme) in Iran and none of these documents bore seals of 'high confidential' or 'secret'?" Ali Asghar Soltanieh said.
"This matter is over, as far as we are concerned."
Western concern was heightened by a revelation in the IAEA report that Iran may have had "foreign expertise" helping in experiments on a detonator applicable to an implosion-type nuclear blast occurring at high altitude.
Informed diplomats said the expertise appeared not to have been given by a government such as North Korea or any remnants of the ex-A.Q. Khan nuclear smuggling network that supplied Iran in the past, but by other non-state actors.
The IAEA has called for an explanation from Iran.
(Editing by Ralph Boulton)
Thursday,Aug 28 2008, 11:37:21 AMRussian versus U.S. a minor cold war begins
Russia, angry with US, takes up Afghan attack at UN
Wednesday,Aug 27 2008, 05:41:44 PMRussia accused by U.N.
Russia accused of torpedoing U.N. action on Georgia
Reuters
By Louis Charbonneau Reuters - Tuesday, August 26 09:56 pm
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Russia's decision to recognize the independence of two Georgian rebel regions on Tuesday has undermined the ability of the U.N. Security Council to resolve the crisis in the Caucasus, Western envoys said.
Russia announced it was recognizing the breakaway enclaves of South Ossetia and Abkhazia after Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Tbilisi's desire to seize one of the rebel zones by force earlier this month had killed all hopes for their peaceful co-existence in one state with Georgia.
Western envoys on the U.N. Security Council have been struggling to overcome a deadlock on a draft resolution that would open the way to an international peacekeeping mission for Georgia and to peace talks between the two former Soviet states, which fought a brief war earlier this month.
The envoys suggested that Russia's decision on Tuesday might prevent the 15-nation council from ever reaching consensus on the issue of Georgia.
"We were making progress, but frankly territorial integrity (of Georgia) was an essential part of that and Russia's actions today have put a massive block in the way of achieving a common Security Council position," British Ambassador John Sawers told reporters ahead of a council session on unrelated issues.
French Deputy Ambassador Jean-Pierre Lacroix echoed Sawers' comments, saying Russia's decision had "dramatically changed" the discussions taking place at the Security Council.
"This is obviously a very far-reaching decision and one that will have wide-ranging implications ... even beyond the Georgian situation," he said.
Earlier U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he worried that Russia's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia might complicate the council's efforts to solve the crisis and could have an impact on "security and stability in the Caucasus."
The main reason for the council's deadlock on the Georgia draft has been that Russia -- like the United States, Britain, France and China -- has veto powers and opposes the inclusion of language reaffirming Georgia's territorial integrity.
"REDRAWING GEORGIA'S BOUNDARIES"
Both Sawers and Lacroix said Russia's move contradicted the six-point cease-fire proposal brokered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, which called for talks on the status of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
They also echoed comments from U.S. President George W. Bush that Moscow had backed previous council resolutions on Georgia that reaffirmed its territorial integrity after the rebel enclaves broke away from Tbilisi in the early 1990s.
"In the space of three weeks Russia has gone from reaffirming Georgia's territorial integrity to using military force to redraw the boundaries of Georgia," Sawers said.
Meanwhile, Georgia's U.N. Ambassador Irakli Alasania ruled out any official discussions between Moscow and Tbilisi.
"At this point I can exclude this kind of talks with Russia (while) the occupation of Georgia is still ongoing," he said.
The crisis erupted after Georgia sent its military on August 7-8 to try to recapture South Ossetia. Russia responded with overwhelming force, sending troops and tanks far into Georgia.
Relations between Russia and Georgia have worsened sharply in recent years over a Georgian drive to join NATO.
(Additional reporting by Patrick Worsnip; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

