Adjunct Professor Clive Williams from the Macquaire University in NSW, Australia, has given a synoptic overview on the war on terror that was the year 2006. In terms of statistics the year that was 2006 was an econometrics delight, a throwback to the Vietnam era of econometric equations to scientifically calculate the formula for winning a war. More importantly, the humanist emotive element was never considered, and, therefore, by providing enumerated statistical charts/graphs/diagrams, and what have you, the scientific proof of evidence was to explain in a reasonable way the nature of the unreasonable and irrational man.

 

"There are lies, damn lies, then statistics" which must also apply to econometric equations on winning a wargame!!!

 

Man by nature is a creature of imperfect unscientific vices such as desires, jealousy, stupidity, revenge, hatred, lust, avarice, and many more emotive vices, that is and was not scientifically quantified by the likes of Adjunct Professor Clive Williams, and other political scientist readers from Macquarie University. Neeedless to say, the synoptic view for the year that was 2006, is merely a post facto post mortem, a coronary autopsy report, of the madness that had dominated the hawkish grim reaper who had delighted the morose senses of the most banal murderous fetish within the most darkest thoughts of every man, woman, and creature, whose emotive unreasonableness abovementioned serves as their raison d'etre for continuing the war on terror as terrorists themselves.

 

The editorial perspective from Wednesday's edition, 27th Dec. 2006, of the Brisbane "Courier Mail",  p 28. We can clearly see that there is something much more than  'damn lies' as the old adage goes regarding statistics...There is equivocation.

 

As I have already mentioned, the editorial view from Adjunct Professor Clive Williams seems to proffer a relevent synopsis, a sweeping eclectic perspective on the econometric statistics on the war on terror thus far! The amorphousness of his perspective seems to converge on the view that Australia is in manageable control of its domestic sphere on the war on terror, neglecting to mention that whilst it may be correct to assume that Australia has been immuned from an Overt acts of terrorism, the picture is by far more sinister and clandestine which would require a conspriacy theory which would include the collusiveness of the media and the information technological spheres on a global context. The Bali situation may be considered as a SATELLITE spheres of influence for Australian tourists to converge and to impart their domestic cultural creature comforts within Indonesian territory, so as a Muslim dominated country, which overwhlems the minority Hindi population, of some 3 million Balinese, it is the most enticing country for any Abu Sayyaf ( Islamic Jihadi) operative, to continue their Jihad in a Hindi State of Bali.

 

The other satellite Australian spheres of influence include the South Pacific region with the Melanesian nations being very acrimonious of late with the recent persona non grata status for Australian diplomats and expulsion from Honiara being at the top of Australian intel faux pas and diplomatic blunders. The Tongan uprising is indirectly Australian linked which will require further regional intel scrutiny in the near future. 

 

Adjunct Professor Clive Williams, unfortunately, could not see the trees through the forest and thoughtlessly assumes that Australia "is in control" of its domestic spheres of influence. Therefore, unlike QANTAS's impeccable international flight record, Australian Intel capabilities (ASIO, AFP, and ASIS) has been very lacklustre in their assertion of domestic control of their intel network alert stations within the region. 

 

 Tim Tufuga 29th Dec. 2006.