The http://www.stormfront.org and http://www.davidduke.com  I have found the most pathetic tirade of Psuedo-intellectual epsitemological tripe based upon the false assumption of innate racial superiority or conversely the psuedo-inferiority of certain racialist groups. Moreover, the arguments for and against the delineation of racial classes according to colour, cred, class, or gender, may be considered easily falsified. The scientific applications used to support David Duke's dissertertion of racial superiority in some of his interesting blogs published in the abovementioned website has given some meandering hyperbole over why certain people are considered superior to others simply due to their colour, race, gender, age as well as the usual socio-economic, and occupational status parameters as used by behavioural scientists. Perhaps, the most disconcerting evidence of irrefutable truth may lay somewhere between the psuedo-affirmation  and self-actualisation of power politics and the disproportionate distribution of power amongst those who wield it and those who are subjected to its influence. More often the vanquished and the subjugated are consigned to the levels of resignation and submission to the whims of those who possess more power resources than they. Hence the purported assumption of power superiority of certain pluralist groups would tend to support a ruling class and elitist theory of power distribution rather than an overt scientific proof of evidence to the racialist agenda by Eugenicists and racists of whom Mr. David Duke (Phd), is considered, in my opinion, most exemplary.

I have read his proofs of evidence regarding the racialist evolutionary gradation process as Eurocentric conquerers and the expansion of their culture to the new world. To encroach upon the cultures of ancient peoples, to usurp, and, to overthrow their ancien regimes, and to replace them with their foreign influences as considered more robust than the indigenous cultural elements. Their religion and their visualised sense of superiority would transfix the unsuspecting new world of the ways of the purported superior encultured invader who come and conquer the indigenous people. The sense of cultural superiority would initially be considered as bellicose (military), then religious, then medical, and finally, educational. The ecclectism of the constant seasoned traveller/explorer, come conquerer, would bring with themselves an aggregation of various experiences and acquire incrementalised power resources which would undoubtedly woo the uninitiated.

With a culmination of shock and awe, the European conquerer would assume racial superiority over the primitive who would, in turn, bow down in awe. With this newly acquired enlightenment for the new world the racialist and racilism ideological myths would be promulgated. Perhaps, the most certain of these myths would be those promulgated by Adolf Hitler, in "Mein Kampf", then managed and administrated by Adolf Eichman's "Final Solution". The latterday Saints of modern day Nazism would be David Dukes and his minions, aforementioned. 

The greatest of these myths would be affirmed and promoted by David Duke which would be the psudo-ideology of Aryanism. With Aryanism is the factual geo-political etymological origins of the racialist ideology as supported through medical-scientific proofs of evidence in the scientific field of Eugenics.

The comparison of power politics in affirming the racialist ideology would further be affirmed by David Duke through applying Marxist axiomatic views paraddoxiaclly so as to refute the correlation between race and class conflict. Instead, he would affirm a pluaralist paradigm of ethnic conflict within liberal democracies, which may be considered as truthful to a point. He goes further to insult the intelligence of every reader by refuting the idea of  "Biological Egalitarianism" as conceived by Franz Boas, and his equalitarian cohorts. Instead, the views being expressed by anti-Egalitarian hereditrarian within the Eugenist school of thought of whom certain Racist elements would contend, including Dr. David Duke's, would delve into the anti-Marxian debate as much as a nature versus nurture debate of how certain individual groups, or races of people, are suceptible to certain level of cultural racial development. The debate is extrapolated in the article "The Concept of Heredity in Western Thought: Part Two" by Dr. Roger Pearson. From a Samoan perspective, in particular, this article touches on the Margerat Mead debate, which would impinge upon the natural sexuality behaviour of certain races of people. The Margaret Mead debate is interesting in the sense that in her anthropological book, as published in 1928, she had argued, inadvertantly, in favour of the Franz Boas anthropological school of thought, of how the 'sexually permissiveness' of the Samoan young women (Aualuma) was, in part, due to the environmental socio-biological factors, as well as, naturally, wherefore attesting to a certain Pavlovian stimuli-response for the sexual urges of Samoan youths in their socio-biological behavioural development as young people in the state of nature. A comparative contrasting perspective of sexual licence and criminal culpability may be considered as culturally and racially significant by the likes of  Dr.David Duke, as seen as affirming the purported inferiority of such sub-species and race of people. ie, the Samoans.

In all, the summation of Dr. David Duke's intellectual findings would be a conceptual prologue for the epistemological and metonomic evolvement of Eurocentrism from its true Nordic origins now encapsulated from its Indo-European origins with the psuedo-associated cultural values and myths. Moreover, Dr. David Duke endeavours to de-mystify the Aryan ideology with his dissertertion, then throuh his blogs. His modern day anti-Semitic diatribes would make Mel Gibson seem like a humble disciple. So Mel Gibson you are not alone in Malibu you have the http://www.stormfront.org and http://www.davidduke.com on your side.

As for the Polynesian people in the South Pacific who have been enligtened by the likes of David Duke and his ancestors who brought us Eurocentrism? Well, we have been enlightened and now we know all too well what it is all about. It is to know that the 'shock and awe' of Eurocentric superiority has only de-sensitised us today.

 Tim Tufuga from Crestmead, Logan City, Queensland, Australia.